An interesting case recently arose in the United States District Court in Connecticut. The plaintiff, who operated a manufacturing facility, hired an alarm company to provide security and surveillance services at the plant and two other facilities.
The parties allegedly executed a service agreement governing the services the alarm company was hired to provide, including a surveillance camera system that notifies human operators when it detects suspicious activity. The plaintiff alleged in its complaint the alarm company can disarm the system in which case the surveillance cameras would register activity but would not activate an alarm or notify human operators of suspicious activity.
Join the ranks of informed security integrators who trust SDM to guide their business decisions and keep them at the forefront of industry developments.
Exclusive Insights: Gain access to unparalleled industry research that provides you with detailed insights and projections that can help you strategically plan and adapt your business.
Professional Development: Podcasts, Videos, and Webinars highlight special topics from security intrusion and monitoring to the latest advancements in artificial intelligence and robotics - each session keeping you informed and ahead of the curve in this fast-paced industry.